Maryland’s Data Center Backlash Is Growing. Here’s What Comes Next

By Denise Robbins, CCAN Communications Team

Across Maryland, communities are hitting the brakes on the rapid buildout of massive data centers.

After Anne Arundel County joined the growing list of jurisdictions adopting a temporary moratorium, roughly 90% of Marylanders now live in a county or city with some form of data center ban or pause, according to CCAN Action Fund’s latest tally. The movement now stretches from Western Maryland to the Eastern Shore and across the state’s largest population centers.

Largo, Prince George’s County Data Center Rally on July 1, 2026

And Maryland is not alone. Across the country, opposition to rapid data center expansion is growing as communities confront concerns about electricity demand, utility bills, water use, noise, land use, and environmental impacts. Recent national polling has found a full seven of ten Americans oppose data centers being built in their area. 

Why communities are pressing pause

The scale of the AI boom is difficult to overstate. AI data centers require enormous amounts of electricity, and many also require significant amounts of water for cooling. In the PJM region, which includes Maryland, rapidly rising data center demand is already threatening grid reliability and infrastructure costs, with many fear these costs being passed onto ratepayers. 

Meanwhile, the rules designed to protect ratepayers, water supplies, local communities, and the climate are still catching up.

That is why so many local governments have chosen temporary pauses. Communities need time to understand the consequences and put enforceable safeguards in place.

Governor Moore acted — but Maryland still hasn’t paused

In mid-September, Maryland Governor Wes Moore said he would “absolutely sign” a statewide data center moratorium if it came to his desk. And yet he issued an executive order one week later that included no mention of a moratorium. 

Instead it created a new statewide framework for reviewing large data center projects. The order created a Maryland Data Center Task Force, required greater transparency and stronger criteria around proposed projects, barred state employees from entering certain nondisclosure agreements with developers, and established principles around ratepayer protection, economic benefits, community input, environmental impacts, and accountability.

Baltimore City Data Center Moratorium Rally June 29, 2026.

Those are meaningful reforms, but it’s not enough. On top of ignoring a statewide moratorium, Governor Moore’s order also did not establish a requirement that new data centers operate on 100% clean energy.

How can Maryland continue approving massive new projects while the state is still developing the rules meant to govern them?

The risks don’t stop at electricity and water

Concerns about AI extend far beyond electricity and water. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 62% of respondents viewed AI as capable of endangering humanity’s future, while leading AI researchers and technology executives have publicly warned that advanced AI could pose catastrophic risks.

Those long-term risks are still being debated. But one thing is already clear: the physical infrastructure powering the AI boom is arriving now, in real communities, with real consequences, and not enough has been done to protect us from those consequences. 

How to Fight Back: Join Marylanders from across the state on November 7

Frederick Amazon Data Center Rally in Adamstown on May 28, 2026

On Saturday, November 7, CCAN and Nature Forward will bring Marylanders together at the Baltimore Convention Center for People Over Data Centers: Maryland Action Summit.

The one-day conference will feature Congressman Jamie Raskin, climate activist and author Bill McKibben, state and local elected officials, environmental-justice leaders, community organizers, and advocates from across Maryland. Panels will cover data center impacts on electricity bills and the grid, water resources, farmland and open space, environmental justice, AI risks, and what stronger statewide safeguards could look like in 2027.

The summit runs from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM, and a $25 general-admission ticket (or $15 for students) includes morning coffee and lunch. 

The fight against Maryland’s data center boom is already statewide. November 7 is a chance to bring those local fights together, learn from one another, and decide what comes next. Learn more and sign up for the People Over Data Centers: Maryland Action Summit!

Sign up for the People Over Data Centers Summit here

The SRM Conversation Is Growing: Nearly 100 Scientists, Advocates, and Skeptics Showed Up to Claim Their Seat

By Quentin Scott, Federal Policy Director, Chesapeake Climate Action Network

Not long ago, conversations about solar reflective methods (SRM) were dominated by one question: How do we stop it? At this year’s Climate Week NYC, we heard a different one: How do we make sure research into this emerging climate technology is done responsibly? 

Nearly 100 scientists, policymakers, advocates, students, skeptics, and supporters came together for Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN)’s SRM Research Hub Crawl to grapple with what responsible research into and governance of SRM could look like. The concerns haven’t disappeared, and they shouldn’t. But as climate impacts grow harder to ignore, people are increasingly willing to move beyond debating whether SRM should exist and start asking how we can responsibly explore its potential to help protect our planet.

That’s what happened on Wednesday, September 23, when CCAN hosted our SRM Research Hub Crawl: Building a Community for Responsible Research and Governance. People across sectors showed up to discuss responsible research into SRM techniques. Such an event would have been hard to imagine in years past, but it showed us how the public is hungry for oversight over responsible research into SRM as climate change becomes harder to ignore.

Why This Conversation Can’t Wait

Let me be clear about where CCAN stands: solar reflective methods are not a substitute for rapidly cutting greenhouse gas emissions. Full stop. We’re still fighting for clean energy alternatives, and against every rollback of climate progress.

Climate change is already forcing hard choices on communities, but policy isn’t keeping pace. Meanwhile, SRM research is growing—whether or not we’re comfortable with it. That doesn’t mean deployment is inevitable, and it certainly doesn’t mean it’s desirable. It means the public deserves a transparent, inclusive conversation about what research is happening, what we still don’t know, and what safeguards would be required if this technology ever were to be deployed.

If that conversation doesn’t happen, the public is left in the dark. With climate change making the road ahead even harder to see, the public needs to move back into the driver’s seat.

Not Your Typical Convening

Most SRM discussions happen in technical and academic settings, with the usual insiders. We wanted to open up the conversation, so we brought it to the bar with our first-ever “Hub Crawl.”

Participants moved between interactive hubs hosted by partner organizations. One hub dug into the science of SRM. Another explored emerging governance frameworks. Others tackled policy debates and what meaningful public engagement should look like. People with very different views on SRM—from supporters to skeptics—engaged directly with the research and the governance challenges around it.

Ben Kalina, director and producer of the Plan C For Civilization documentary, said the SRM field has always been “dangerously shrouded in mystery,” dominated by a small number of researchers and personalities. He called the event fun:“Standing on the roof, talking about the earth’s reflectivity, it was like a sci-fi mini-convention sharing what we’ve learned—and what we don’t know—with a curious and questioning Climate Week community,” he said.

I’ll take it. Serious doesn’t have to mean stuffy.

Different Perspectives, Shared Questions

This year’s Climate Week took place after a record-shattering summer, on the heels of the hottest month ever recorded and 12 billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. Our co-host, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS),  pointed to urgency. Dr. Hannah Safford, FAS’s Associate Director of Climate and Environment, pointed to glacier collapse and flash flooding in the Himalayas and unbearable heat around the world. “We owe it to ourselves, our neighbors, and our kids,” she said, “to rigorously, responsibly explore tools like SRM that could help reduce climate risks, even as we continue to ramp up mitigation and adaptation.”

The organizations that joined us don’t all agree with one another, and that was the point: the Federation of American Scientists, University of Chicago, Reflective, Degrees Initiative, Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering, Environmental Defense Fund, Plan C For Civilization Documentary, and SRM360. Thank you to every one of them who attended and shared their views. 

Research Is Not Deployment

I say this often, and I’ll keep saying it: CCAN does not support SRM deployment. We do support studying whether it could work, what the risks are, who would be affected, and who gets a say. Those are responsible questions, and we need answers before other nations or private companies make those decisions for us.

Decisions about whether, how, and under what conditions research proceeds should be shaped by rigorous science, strong safeguards, and public accountability. Most of all, they should be shaped by the people most affected by climate change, not by whoever has the most money or the loudest voices.

Earlier this year, we watched lawmakers in statehouses across the country push bills to ban even the study of these technologies, many built on conspiracy theories rather than evidence. Banning research doesn’t make the technologies disappear. It just ensures we won’t have the full picture if it ever comes time to make a decision.

Climate Week’s Hub Crawl showed an alternative path: a room full of people from all backgrounds, willing to ask hard questions in public, backed by scientific research.

What Comes Next

Responsible SRM research is no longer a fringe topic in the climate community. As the climate crisis intensifies and policy lags, SRM is moving onto the agenda. The real question is who will be in the room when decisions get made.

If scientists, advocates, and affected communities don’t show up, a small number of people who have their own agendas will fill that space.

CCAN will keep bringing people together and pushing for SRM research that is transparent, publicly accountable, and governed by strong safeguards. We’ll also keep fighting for the cuts in carbon pollution that nothing else can replace.

If you’re curious, skeptical, or both—good. Join us. We’d love to hear from you.

Sign up to volunteer with CCAN!

About the author: Quentin Scott (he/him) joined CCAN in January 2021 as part of the newly created CCAN Federal Team. He moved from Chicago specifically to build political will for groundbreaking national climate and climate justice policies. Growing up on the South Side of Chicago, he got a first-hand look at the two Americas and sought to bring the two Americas closer together through advocacy.

Before joining CCAN, Quentin was chief of staff for an Illinois State Representative and a legislative correspondent in the US House of Representatives, and has led numerous issue and candidate campaigns across the Midwest and East Coast. In his roles, he has stood with neighborhood groups to hold industrial polluters accountable in communities of color and looks forward to bringing that fight to the federal level.

IMG_1068

SCC Staff Right to Recommend Merger Denial as Data Center Costs Mount

Climate group warns Virginia families could be left footing the bill for Big Tech’s power grab if merger goes through


RICHMOND, VA — The staff of Virginia’s State Corporation Commission (SCC) recommended on Monday that regulators deny NextEra Energy’s proposed $67 billion acquisition of Dominion Energy as currently proposed, concluding that the companies have not proven that “adequate service to the public at just and reasonable rates will not be impaired or jeopardized.” The same day, Governor Abigail Spanberger filed expert testimony urging the SCC to reject the deal unless NextEra and Dominion agree to freeze base residential rates for six years, triple customer bill credits, and accept structural reforms to ensure “large data centers bear the cost of their own energy needs — not families.”

In testimony filed yesterday, SCC staff found that the merger would expose Dominion to the financial and business risks of NextEra’s unregulated, competitive businesses. Staff also flagged Dominion’s growing dependence on buying power from the regional market – 25% of the electricity it supplied in 2025, compared with 3% at NextEra’s Florida Power & Light – and noted that rising purchased power costs “appear to stem from growth in data center customers.” The companies’ proposed $10-a-month residential bill credit would “only somewhat mitigate” steadily rising bills, staff concluded. When the credits run out in 2031, a typical residential bill is projected to jump nearly 8% in a single year, to $226.55 a month.

Victoria Higgins, Virginia Director of Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), issued the following statement:

“Yesterday, the Commission’s own experts and the Governor of Virginia corroborated what families across the Commonwealth have been saying: this merger is a bad deal for Virginia. NextEra isn’t coming to Virginia to lower anyone’s bills. It’s coming to cash in on the largest data center market in the world, and it’s counting on ordinary Virginians to bankroll the buildout.

The byzantine corporate structure that would be spawned by this acquisition exposes regulated customers in Virginia to immense risk, particularly as we face an onslaught of infrastructure requests from data centers. A temporary $10 credit is a rounding error next to the billions in new power plants and market purchases needed to feed Big Tech. The SCC should listen to its staff and reject this merger.”

SCC staff said it would not oppose the merger if the companies accept a lengthy list of additional conditions, including an independent Dominion board of directors, limits on dividends, a 10-year guarantee of current Virginia employment levels, and a requirement that Dominion retain “ultimate decision-making authority” over how it meets demand from large load customers. Governor Spanberger, the first Virginia governor to intervene in an SCC case, said she remains “deeply skeptical” that the merger, “as currently structured, will adequately protect consumers.” Earlier this month, Lt. Governor Ghazala Hashmi became the first statewide elected official to flatly oppose the deal. Last week, Dominion’s 2026 Integrated Resource Plan update projected that a typical residential bill would climb by more than $100 a month over the next two decades, driven in large part by data center demand.

#   #   #

Chesapeake Climate Action Network is the first grassroots organization dedicated exclusively to raising awareness about the impacts and solutions associated with global warming in the Chesapeake Bay region. Founded in 2002, CCAN has been at the center of the fight for clean energy and wise climate policy in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC.

Dominion’s Updated Energy Plan Doubles Pollution as it Prepares to Merge with NextEra

Typical bills climb by over $100 a month as data centers demand more energy


RICHMOND, VA — Dominion Energy’s newly filed 2026 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) update projects that the utility’s carbon pollution will more than double compared to last year’s plan while customer bills climb steadily for the next two decades. Under the IRP’s “preferred path” that the company submitted to Virginia’s State Corporation Commission (SCC), a typical residential bill for 1,000 kilowatt-hours would rise from $180.31 to $283.65 a month – an increase of more than $100 – as Dominion pursues nearly 9,000 megawatts of new gas-fired generation and six small modular nuclear reactors to meet a demand forecast driven in large part by new data centers. The company estimates its preferred plan will cost $91.5 billion, costs that will be passed on to customers through their electric rates.

Dominion’s preferred plan ignores state requirements on at least three accounts. While the update increases planned solar and battery storage over last year’s plan, the battery targets fall well short of recent statutory requirements (SB 448 / HB 895, 2026). Dominion’s calculations do not appear to square with Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative requirements targeting zero tons of greenhouse gas emissions from large power plants by 2045. In addition, Dominion’s preferred path would keep its fossil fuel plants running past 2045, the date by which the Virginia Clean Economy Act (VCEA) requires them to close. Dominion now forecasts demand rising 2.8% a year, up from 2.5% in last year’s update, and expects its preferred path to emit 47 million metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2046 – up from 21.8 million in last year’s plan.

Victoria Higgins, Virginia Director of Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), issued the following statement:

“With every new energy plan, Dominion gives up a little more on the planet and jacks up rates a little higher to serve data centers. Now, as Dominion awaits a decision on NextEra’s proposed acquisition, it plans to double its pollution while the typical family’s bill climbs by more than $100 a month. 

Communities will see this plan for what it really is: a blueprint for billions of dollars in new gas plants to chase Big Tech’s appetite for power. The SCC must hold Dominion to the clean energy laws on the books, and Virginia leaders must rein in data center growth before it drains all of our natural resources, further punishes the poor and destroys the middle class.”

In July 2025, the SCC directed Dominion to model at least one scenario fully aligned with the VCEA, including the scheduled retirement of its fossil fuel plants. Dominion’s update sets that path aside in favor of a preferred plan that keeps gas burning. The preferred plan’s gas buildout does not even count the roughly 5 Gigawatts of gas plants Dominion has already proposed in Chesterfield and Cumberland counties. The update arrives as Dominion and NextEra seek state approval for a proposed merger that would create the largest regulated utility monopoly in the world.

#   #   #

Chesapeake Climate Action Network is the first grassroots organization dedicated exclusively to raising awareness about the impacts and solutions associated with global warming in the Chesapeake Bay region. Founded in 2002, CCAN has been at the center of the fight for clean energy and wise climate policy in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC.

Lt. Governor Hashmi Right to Oppose NextEra and Dominion Mega-Merger

Climate group commends Virginia’s Lt. Governor for taking a clear stance against creation of largest utility monopoly in the world 


RICHMOND, VA — Virginia Lieutenant Governor Ghazala Hashmi announced yesterday her opposition to NextEra’s acquisition of Dominion Energy. The announcement came after the conclusion of a five-stop listening tour during which the Lt. Governor heard Virginians’ concerns about the merger in Loudoun County, Norfolk, Richmond, Charlottesville, and Roanoke. CCAN Virginia Director joined the Lt. Governor as the energy expert on the panel in Roanoke.

The Virginia State Corporation Commission decision on the merger, which would create the largest regulated utility monopoly in the world, hinges on whether approval would impair or jeopardize “just and reasonable rates.” Recent polling shows that three in four Virginians (76%) believe the merger will increase electric bills.

Victoria Higgins, Virginia Director of Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), issued the following statement:

“We are thankful that Lieutenant Governor Hashmi took the time to hear out Virginians on this topic, and ultimately for taking a strong stance in opposition. We, too, are hearing deep concerns from people all over the state. Virginians see this for what it is: one more leg of the billionaire class’s AI arms race that is robbing everyday families of money, health, jobs, land, and water. It appears that NextEra is only here to capitalize on and accelerate data center infrastructure buildout as the rest of the country wakes up and turns them away.”

The Lt. Governor is the first statewide elected official to flatly oppose the merger. Governor Abigail Spanberger is a formal intervenor in the case before the State Corporation Commission and has expressed that she is “skeptical of the benefits this merger would deliver to Virginia.”

#   #   #

Chesapeake Climate Action Network is the first grassroots organization dedicated exclusively to raising awareness about the impacts and solutions associated with global warming in the Chesapeake Bay region. Founded in 2002, CCAN has been at the center of the fight for clean energy and wise climate policy in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC.

Maryland PSC Approves Two Battery Storage Projects; Coalition Urges Continued Progress Toward Grid Reliability Goals

BALTIMORE, MD — The Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) selected yesterday the Chalk Point Storage Project (Prince George’s County, 400 MW) and Jade Meadow III Battery Storage (Garrett County, 40 MW) under the Round 1 solicitation of the Next Generation Energy Act (NGEA). A coalition of clean energy and environmental organizations thanks the Commission for its work throughout the Case 9866 process and welcomes the approvals as a step forward for Maryland’s grid but calls on the PSC to do more.

What yesterday’s decision means:

  • Progress on reliability and affordability: The selected project(s) will add 440 MW of transmission-connected, 4-hour battery storage, helping stabilize supply and demand and insulate ratepayers from peak pricing.
  • Local benefits: The Chalk Point Storage Project and Jade Meadow III Battery Project are expected to bring construction jobs, permanent maintenance positions, and steady tax revenue to Prince George’s County and Garrett County. 
  • Next step is construction approval: The approved project(s) must still secure PSC construction approval, including additional public hearings on safety, siting, and environmental review, expected in late 2026 and into 2027.

The state’s grid — under mounting strain from PJM capacity constraints and rising demand — needs every cost-effective storage resource it can bring online. 

In response to yesterday’s decision, advocates released the following statements: 

“The proposals in this docket represent several years of state policymaking pertaining to grid reliability and a state storage program. 440 MW is a significant increase to our grid’s capacity. At a time when electricity affordability is a paramount concern for Marylanders, storage can reduce overall electricity system costs and can prevent rate increases by improving grid efficiency, maximizing low-cost renewable energy, and strengthening system reliability,” said Rebecca Rehr, Director of Climate Policy and Justice, Maryland League of Conservation Voters.

“Maryland should celebrate these first-round approvals, but we cannot stop at 440 megawatts when the state has set a 3,000-megawatt energy-storage goal by 2033 and sought 800 megawatts in this round alone,” said Brittany Baker, Maryland Director at Chesapeake Climate Action Network. “The Commission should build on this progress with an ambitious Round 2 that brings substantially more storage online, prioritizes responsible siting and community engagement, and gives Maryland households the reliable, affordable clean-energy grid they deserve.”

“While we commend the Commission approving these two projects for Energy Storage Capacity Credits, it missed a critical opportunity to deploy more clean capacity,” said Josh Tulkin, Sierra Club Maryland Chapter Director. “Maryland urgently needs to add more storage to the grid to combat rising electricity prices, improve reliability, and meet its climate targets. The approval of only two projects does not meet the urgency of this moment. The Commission should approve credits for more storage capacity in Round 2, including projects like the large, six-hour Oystercatcher project.”

As the PSC gears up for Round 2 solicitation, due to launch by January 1, 2027, advocates look forward to consideration of more energy storage projects that deliver the additional storage capacity Maryland needs to meet its reliability and climate goals.

# # #

Chesapeake Climate Action Network is the first grassroots organization dedicated exclusively to raising awareness about the impacts and solutions associated with global warming in the Chesapeake Bay region. Founded in 2002, CCAN has been at the center of the fight for clean energy and wise climate policy in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC.

Maryland LCV educates and activates people to take equitable and just political actions for clean water, healthy air, and climate-resilient communities.

Founded in 1892, the Sierra Club is America’s oldest and largest grassroots environmental organization. The Maryland Chapter has over 70,000 members and supporters, and the Sierra Club nationwide has approximately 800,000 members.

Spanberger Energy Plan Strongly Prioritizes Low-Cost Clean Energy

Modeling demonstrates urgent need to curb data center load growth


RICHMOND, VA — Governor Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) released today her State Energy Plan, a document required by state code that must outline approaches to achieving a net-zero economy across all sectors no later than 2045. The Plan’s policy recommendations strongly depart from the gas and nuclear-heavy approach favored by former Governor Glenn Youngkin and instead principally focus on unlocking low-cost, clean energy resources that meet the Governor’s affordability goals and are aligned with state decarbonization statutes. The Plan takes seriously the potential for energy efficiency, demand flexibility, and distributed energy resources to contribute meaningfully to a sophisticated, modern grid. 

The Plan leans on existing state statute and load growth forecasts to produce resource portfolio model outputs that also make clear that the Commonwealth needs strong action to curb data center load growth. The Governor’s remarks made clear that the three “policy adjusted” scenarios are preferred by the administration and policy recommendations are in keeping with said scenarios. While not a major contributor to those preferred scenarios, gas fuel cells – modeled in the Plan principally to power data centers behind-the-meter – contribute carbon emissions to the atmosphere that accelerate climate change.

 Victoria Higgins, Virginia Director of Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), issued the following statement:

“What a difference a year makes. Governor Spanberger’s Energy Plan is a massive departure from the unserious, polluter-friendly agenda peddled by the Youngkin Administration. The Plan clearly prioritizes low-cost, clean energy resources and the development of a modern, flexible grid. It is high time we thoughtfully grapple with the short- and long-term costs of pollution to health and communities, as this Plan does. 

We further appreciate that the Plan ensures that utility incentives and compensation are aligned with performance outcomes, and renewable procurement is competitive and results in the low-cost projects we see nationwide. This is particularly important as we face the potential for the NextEra/Dominion mega-merger, a union we believe will result in higher energy costs and greater political interference. 

This Plan comes at an exceptionally challenging moment for energy affordability. The modeling output demonstrates that AI data center load growth is out of control. Virginia communities should house energy infrastructure that serves community needs, not Big Tech profits. We should not add a single Megawatt of data center demand to the Virginia energy landscape until policy protections are fully realized.”

After several months of stakeholder and community input as to problems, methodologies, and solutions the administration should prioritize, the Plan outlines five different policy scenarios and the electricity resource portfolios that could meet demand under those conditions. The low and no new gas policy scenarios represent the lowest-cost resource portfolios when the impact of air pollutants to public health and the economy is accounted for. Such costs are externalized to Virginia families through burdens such as hospital bills, crop failures, and extreme weather events, and are often unaccounted for in utility planning models that favor polluting resources. 

#   #   #

Chesapeake Climate Action Network is the first grassroots organization dedicated exclusively to raising awareness about the impacts and solutions associated with global warming in the Chesapeake Bay region. Founded in 2002, CCAN has been at the center of the fight for clean energy and wise climate policy in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC.